4.7 Article

Introduction of non-natural amino acid residues into the substrate-specific P1 position of trypsin inhibitor SFTI-1 yields potent chymotrypsin and cathepsin G inhibitors

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 3302-3307

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.03.045

关键词

Inhibitors, Peptides; Chemical synthesis; Cathepsin G; Chymotrypsin; Phenylalanine derivatives

资金

  1. University of Gdansk [BW/8000-5-0125-8]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [2889/H03/2008/34]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of trypsin inhibitor SFTI-1 compounds modified in substrate-specific P-1 position was synthesized by the solid-phase method. Lys5 present in the wild inhibitor was replaced by Phe derivatives substituted in para position of the phenyl ring, L-pyridylalanine and N-4-nitrobenzylgycine. Their inhibitory activities with bovine alpha-chymotrypsin and cathepsin G were estimated by determination of association equilibrium constants (K-a). All analogues inhibited bovine alpha-chymotrypsin. The highest inihbitory activity displayed peptides with the fluorine, nitro and methyl substituents. They were 13-15-fold more active than [Phe(5)] SFTI-1 used as a reference. They are the most potent chymotrypsin inhibitors of this size. Substitution of Lys5 by Phe did not change the cathepsin G inhibitory activity. Introduction of Phe( p-F), Phe (p-NH2) and Phe(p-CH3) in this position retained the affinity towards this proteinase, whereas Phe(p-guanidine) gave an inhibitor more than twice as active, which appeared to be stable in human serum. On the other hand, a peptomeric analogue with N-4-nitrobenzylglycine failed to inhibit cathepsin G. Despite the fact the introduced amino acids were non-coded, the peptide bonds formed by them were hydrolyzed by chymotrypsin. We postulate that additional interaction of para-substitutents with the enzyme are responsible for the enhanced inhibitory activity of the analogues. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据