4.5 Article

Survival to intensive care unit discharge among in-hospital cardiac arrest patients by applying audiovisual feedback device

期刊

ESC HEART FAILURE
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 4652-4660

出版社

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13628

关键词

Survival; In-hospital cardiac arrest; Cardio First Angel (TM); ICU length of stay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the survival rate of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest after discharge from the intensive care unit, finding that the implementation of feedback devices improved survival and length of stay.
Aims Survival rates after in-hospital cardiac arrest remain very low. Although there is evidence that the use of audiovisual feedback devices can improve compression components, there are no data on patient survival. Therefore, we conducted this study to analyse the survival rate of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest after discharge from the intensive care unit. Methods and results This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel study of patients who received either standard manual chest compression or a real-time feedback device. Parametric and semi-parametric models were fitted to the data. Different survival time of length of stay was investigated by univariate and multiple analyses. Pearson's correlation between length of stay and hospital length of stay was obtained. A total of 900 patients with a mean survival time of 35 days were included. Intervention was associated with a higher length of stay. Relative time was significant in adjusted fitted log-normal regression for intervention group, female gender, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the night shift. A positive correlation between length of stay and hospital length of stay was found. Conclusions Implementation of feedback device improved survival and length of stay. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during the night shift decreased the survival time, which could be due to the inexperienced staff available outside working hours.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据