4.7 Article

Design of a Flexure-Jointed Linkage in a Quadruped Walking Robot

期刊

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 4022-4032

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2022.3150963

关键词

Flexure-jointed linkage (FJL); large deflection; optimal design; quadruped robot

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51721003, 91948301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article addresses the optimal design of a large-deflection FJL for a compliant quadruped robot. The proposed FJL is derived from a rigid six-bar linkage to mimic the foot path of walking mammals. Its kinematic and strain energy models are verified through numerical simulations, showcasing the effectiveness of predicting deflections and the feasibility of applying compliant linkages for legged robots.
Flexure-jointed linkages (FJLs) have distinct advantages, such as ease of manufacturing and assembly, no backlash, and light weight designs, over their rigid counterparts. However, the synthesis and analysis of FJLs are more complicated, especially when the compliant flexures have large deflections. This article addresses the optimal design of a large-deflection FJL, which is used as the leg of a compliant quadruped robot. The proposed FJL originates from a rigid six-bar linkage to mimic the foot path of walking mammals by replacing the passive revolute joints with two-segment combined flexible beams. Its kinematic and strain energy models are derived and verified by numerical simulations. Subjecting to material failures and geometrical constraints, the optimization of the FJL is carried out by minimizing the path deviation and strain energy to reduce needed input power, leading to the development of a quadruped walking robot. Experimental tests on the output path of the FJL and the motion capability of the robot are implemented. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the derived models in predicting the deflections of the FJL and the feasibility of applying compliant linkages for legged robots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据