4.7 Article

Extended relaxation time approximation and relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 831, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137202

关键词

Relativistic kinetic theory; Relativistic fluid dynamics; Hydrodynamic models

资金

  1. DST-INSPIRE faculty award [DST/INSPIRE/04/2017/000038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a new framework for deriving relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equation with energy-dependent relaxation time is developed. The framework is shown to be compatible with conservation laws and corrections to transport coefficients due to energy dependence of relaxation time are discussed. The ratios of these transport coefficients are studied using a parametrized relaxation-time, revealing interesting scaling features.
Development of a new framework for derivation of order-by-order hydrodynamics from Boltzmann equation is necessary as the widely used Anderson-Witting formalism leads to violation of fundamental conservation laws when the relaxation-time depends on particle energy, or in a hydrodynamic frame other than the Landau frame. We generalize an existing framework for consistent derivation of relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equation with an energy-dependent relaxation-time by extending the Anderson-Witting relaxation-time approximation. We argue that the present framework is compatible with conservation laws and derive first-order hydrodynamic equations in landau frame. Further, we show that the transport coefficients, such as shear and bulk viscosity as well as charge and heat diffusion currents, have corrections due to the energy dependence of relaxation-time compared to what one obtains from the Anderson-Witting approximation of the collision term. The ratios of these transport coefficients are studied using a parametrized relaxation-time, and several interesting scaling features are reported. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据