4.7 Article

Single-stranded DNA aptamers specific for antibiotics tetracyclines

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 15, 页码 7245-7253

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.06.033

关键词

antibiotics; tetracyclines; aptamer; ssDNA; SELEX

资金

  1. Seoul R BD program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tetracyclines (TCs) are a group of antibiotics comprising of a common tetracycline (TET) nucleus with variable X-1 and X-2 positions on 5 and 6 carbon atoms, such as oxytetracycline (OTC) and doxycycline (DOX). In this study, the tetracycline group specific (TGS) ssDNA aptamers were identified by modified SELEX method by employing tosylactivated magnetic beads (TMB) coated with OTC, TET, and DOX, respectively, as targets and counter targets. Twenty TGS-aptamers were selected, of which seven aptamers, designated as T7, T15, T19, T20, T22, T23, and T24, showed high affinity to the basic TET backbone (K-d = 63-483 nM). The specificity of these TGS-aptamers to structural analogues followed the order in which the TCs was employed during SELEX process (OTC > TET > DOX) except aptamer T22, which was highly specific to TET than OTC or DOX. Aptamers that were specific to one target molecule but fail to bind the other structurally related TCs were eliminated during counter selection steps. Three aptamers, T7, T19, and T23 contained palindromic consensus sequence motif GGTGTGG. The remaining TGS-aptamers showed many consensus sequences that are truncated forms of this palindrome forming mirror image or inverted sequences. For example, GTGG or its inverted form, GGTG motif was found in all TGS-aptamers. A consensus sequence motif TGTGCT or its truncated terminal T-residue was found in most TGS-aptamers, which is predicted to be essential for high affinity and group specificity. These TGS-aptamers have potential applications such as target drug delivery, and detection of TCs in pharmaceutical preparations and contaminated food products. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据