4.6 Article

Upregulation of miR-362-3p Modulates Proliferation and Anchorage-Independent Growth by Directly Targeting Tob2 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 116, 期 8, 页码 1563-1573

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.25110

关键词

EPIGENETIC REGULATION; microRNA-362-3p; Tob2; HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81171896]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [20110141110015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) contributes to the pathogenesis of human malignancies, and miRNA expression can be affected by genetic and epigenetic changes, such as methylation of the CpG islands of their promoters. To identify miRNAs regulated by DNA methylation, the global miRNA expression profile was analyzed in two hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines and two normal immortalized cell lines treated with 5-Aza-2-deoxycytidine (DAC, an inhibitor of DNA methylation) plus TSA (Trichostatin A, histone deacetylase inhibitor). Results revealed that these epigenetic drugs differentially affect miRNA expression that is dependent or independent of cell type, especially miR-362-3p. miR-362-3p expression increased while methylation of its promoter significantly decreased in human HCC cells and tissues compared with normal cells and adjacent noncancerous tissues. Ectopic expression of miR-362-3p increased proliferation and anchorage-independent soft agar growth and its expression inhibition had opposing effects that were associated with regulation of its direct targetTob2 in HCC cells. Inhibition of Tob2 recapitulated the effects of miR-362-3p overexpression, whereas enforced Tob2 expression reversed the promoting effects of miR-362-3p. Tob2 expression was reduced in human primary HCCs compared to adjacent noncancerous tissues. Our findings suggest that dysregulation of miR-362-3p and Tob2 may contribute to HCC malignancy. J. Cell. Biochem. 116: 1563-1573, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据