4.1 Article

A learning-based algorithm for generation of synthetic participatory mapping data in 2D and 3D

期刊

METHODSX
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101871

关键词

GIS; PPGIS; Synthetic data; 3D; 2D; participatory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Public participation GIS (PPGIS) involves collecting spatial data through map-based surveys where participants express their experiences and opinions. Synthetic data development can provide realistic datasets for methodological development.
Public participation GIS (PPGIS) is a kind of spatial data that is collected through map-based surveys in which participants create map features and express their experiences and opinions associated with various places. PPGIS is widely used in urban and environmental research. PPGIS is often implemented through online surveys and points are the most common mapped features. PPGIS data provide invaluable experiential spatial knowledge. Nevertheless, collection of this data for purely methodological purposes may be costly and unnecessary. Therefore, we developed a context-aware method that can learn from previously collected PPGIS data and create a realistic dataset that can be used for methodological development purposes. The synthetic data can be generated for any desired geographical extent in both 2D and 3D, i.e. with Z coordinates. The latter is particularly important as 3D PPGIS is an emerging frontier and limited infrastructures currently exist for collection of such data. Hence, while the relevant technology is developing, spatial analytical developments can also advance using such synthetic data. This method:Learns from existing 2D and 3D PPGIS data in relation to the geographical context.Creates a realistic and context-aware simulated PPGIS point dataset.The paper concludes by addressing the limitations and envisioning future research directions.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据