4.7 Article

Novel analogs of D-ef-MAPP and B13.: Part 1:: Synthesis and evaluation as potential anticancer agents

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 1015-1031

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.08.033

关键词

D-e-MAPP; B13; ceramide; lysosomotropic; mitochondriotropic; ceramidase; ceramidase inhibitors; synthesis; cytotoxicity; LC-MS; NMR

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01CA097132, CO6RR018823, P01 CA097132-05, P01 CA097132] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [C06 RR018823] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of novel isosteric analogs of the ceramidase inhibitors, (1S,2R)-N-myristoylamino-phenylpropanol-1 (D-e-MAPP) and (1R,2R)-N-myristoylamino-4'-nitro-phenylpropandiol-1,3 (B13), with modified targeting and physicochemical properties were designed, synthesized, and evaluated as potential anticancer agents. When MCF7 cells were treated with the analogs, results indicated that the new analogs were of equal or greater potency compared to the parent compounds. Their activity was predominantly defined by the nature of the modification of the N-acyl hydrophobic interfaces: N-acyl analogs (class A), urea analogs (class B), N-alkyl analogs (class C, lysosomotropic agents), and omega-cationic-N-acyl analogs (class D, mitochondriotropic agents). The most potent compounds belonged to either class D, the aromatic ceramidoids, or to class C, the aromatic N-alkylaminoalcohols. Representative analogs selected from this study were also evaluated by the National Cancer Institute In Vitro Anticancer Drug Discovery Screen. Again, results showed a similar class-dependent activity. In general, the active analogs were non-selectively broad spectrum and had promising activity against all cancer cell lines. However, some active analogs of the D-e-MAPP family were selective against different types of cancer. Compounds LCL85, LCL120, LCL385, LCL284, and LCL204 were identified to be promising lead compounds for therapeutic development. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据