4.7 Article

The role of solutes in grain refinement of hypoeutectic magnesium and aluminum alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNESIUM AND ALLOYS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 1846-1856

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2022.01.013

关键词

Solidification microstructure; Grain refinement; Solute elements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the impact of solutes on grain formation, with experimental data suggesting a clear correlation between grain size and the solidification range of the alloy. Mechanisms related to grain refining operate under specific experimental conditions.
The effect of solutes on grain formation has been studied over a century but is still under debating, simply because it is a very complex topic. This article focuses on the effect of dissolved solute on the growth, fragmentation of a dendrite and the resultant grain size. Experimental data on grain size in magnesium and aluminum alloys with various solute concentrations are collected and analyzed using phase diagram variables including Q, P , and AT . The physical meaning of each phase diagram variable is discussed. Curve fitting of the recently proposed two-parameter models with experimental data suggests that there is a clear correlation between the measured grain size and the solidification range of the alloy over the entire range of the hypoeutectic composition. Such a trend of grain size vs. AT is closely related to the grain refining mechanisms operating under relevant experimental conditions. A critical review of the grain refining mechanisms indicates that the mechanisms associated with the dendrite fragmentation are operating under the conditions where convection is substantial in the melt during its solidification. (c) 2022 Chongqing University. Publishing services provided by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer review under responsibility of Chongqing University

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据