4.3 Article

Employees' Perceptions of Green HRM and Non-Green Employee Work Outcomes: The Social Identity and Stakeholder Perspectives

期刊

GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 594-622

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1059601116664610

关键词

corporate social responsibility; intention to quit; organizational citizenship behavior toward the organization; organizational identification; perceived green human resource management; perceived organizational support; task performance

资金

  1. Chinese National Science Foundation [71132003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that perceived green HRM influences employee workplace outcomes through organizational identification, and perceived organizational support moderates this effect.
Green human resource management (green HRM) refers to a set of HRM practices that organizations adopt to improve employee workplace green performance. While the effect of perceived green HRM on employee workplace green performance has received some empirical support, its relationship with employee non-green workplace outcomes remains unexplored and, therefore, unknown. This research tests an integrative moderated-mediation model related to the relationship between perceived green HRM and non-green workplace outcomes including employee task performance, organizational citizenship behavior toward the organization (OCBO) and intention to quit, and the underlying mechanisms. Analyses of the multisourced data reveal that perceived green HRM influences these three non-green employee workplace outcomes through a motivational social and psychological process (i.e., organizational identification). Perceived organizational support (POS) moderates the effect of perceived green HRM on organizational identification and the indirect effect of perceived green HRM on the three employee workplace outcomes, via the mediation of organizational identification. This research advances our knowledge about the relationship between perceived green HRM and non-green employee workplace outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据