4.8 Article

High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide

期刊

NATURE
卷 608, 期 7922, 页码 571-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-14-CE02-0021]
  2. BNP-Paribas Foundation
  3. Biodiversa Eranet
  4. AXA Research Fund for the Invasion Biology Chair
  5. J. E. Purkyne Fellowship of the Czech Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biological invasions have led to significant impacts on global economy and biodiversity, with costs showing a rapid increase over time. The study reveals that the damage costs of biological invasions are significantly higher than management expenditures, highlighting the need for further improvement in research methods.
Biological invasions are responsible for substantial biodiversity declines as well as high economic losses to society and monetary expenditures associated with the management of these invasions(1,2). The InvaCost database has enabled the generation of a reliable, comprehensive, standardized and easily updatable synthesis of the monetary costs of biological invasions worldwide(3). Here we found that the total reported costs of invasions reached a minimum of US$1.288 trillion (2017 US dollars) over the past few decades (1970-2017), with an annual mean cost of US$26.8 billion. Moreover, we estimate that the annual mean cost could reach US$162.7 billion in 2017. These costs remain strongly underestimated and do not show any sign of slowing down, exhibiting a consistent threefold increase per decade. We show that the documented costs are widely distributed and have strong gaps at regional and taxonomic scales, with damage costs being an order of magnitude higher than management expenditures. Research approaches that document the costs of biological invasions need to be further improved. Nonetheless, our findings call for the implementation of consistent management actions and international policy agreements that aim to reduce the burden of invasive alien species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据