4.7 Article

Breaking rate-limiting steps in a red mud-sewage sludge carbon catalyst activated peroxymonosulfate system: Effect of pyrolysis temperature

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121805

关键词

Pyrolysis temperature; Rate -limiting step; Carbon -based catalysts; Peroxymonosulfate; Active site

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52100156]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [21JCQNJC00400]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology [GJHZ20200731095801005, JCYJ20200109150210400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By increasing the pyrolysis temperature, the rate-limiting step of the RSDBC-500/PMS system can be broken, leading to an improvement in SMX degradation efficiency. The elevation of temperature facilitates PMS activation and active species production.
The active sites on biochar surface could be increased via pyrolysis of sewage sludge (SS) with mixing red mud (RM), improving its catalytic activity effectively. Pyrolysis temperature plays an important role in the regulation of active sites on the catalyst surface. Herein, the RM-SS carbon-based catalysts (RSDBC) were prepared under different pyrolysis temperatures to activate peroxymonosulfate (PMS) for sulfamethoxazole (SMX) degradation. It was found that the rate-limiting step (first oxidation stage) of the RSDBC-500/PMS system could be broken by increasing the pyrolysis temperature from 500 degrees C to 700 degrees C, leading to a 1.9-fold increase in SMX degradation efficiency within 120 min. Furthermore, the specific surface area (SSA) and the content of C--O, defects, Fe(II), pyridinic N, and graphite N sites of RSDBC increased during the elevation of temperature (500-700 degrees C), thereby facilitating PMS activation and active species production. The breakage of the rate-limiting step provided the theoretical basis for the optimal preparation of sludge biochar-based catalysts, which is beneficial to promote the application of RSDBC/PMS system in wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据