4.5 Article

Dendritic cell migration in different micropore filter assays

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 71, 期 1, 页码 5-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-2478(99)00161-3

关键词

dendritic cells; chemotaxis; methods; Boyden chamber

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendritic cells (DC) are highly motile and have been shown to migrate in vitro or in vivo towards various chemoattractants. Micropore filter methods with polycarbonate tilters are generally used in these in vitro experiments. Among others, the main drawback of these filters is their thickness, which does not allow any assessment of effects of absolute concentration compared to gradients, The aim of this study was to establish a chemotaxis assay for dendritic cells using nitrocellulose filters, which can be adapted for checkerboard studies to distinguish between chemokinesis and chemotaxis. Immature DC were generated by culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells using granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-4. We tested cell migration into nitrocellulose in a Boyden microchemotaxis chamber (leading front assay) and compared this method to the commonly used polycarbonate filter technique. Dendritic cells migrated well into nitrocellulose towards gradients of formyl peptide, complement fragment 5a, and monocyte chemotactic protein-3. The nitrocellulose method appeared to be more sensitive as compared to experiments testing migration across polycarbonate filters. Subsequent checkerboard analyses confirmed chemotactic activities of formyl peptide and complement fragment 5a. However, depending on the assay system, chemotaxis in polycarbonate filters but chemokinesis in nitrocellulose filters were observed for monocyte chemotactic protein-3. Measurement of DC migration in a cellulose nitrate micropore filter assay is more sensitive than the commonly used polycarbonate method and can be adapted for checkerboard analyses. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据