4.7 Article

Serial echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dimensions and function after myocardial infarction in mice

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 330-338

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00274-6

关键词

heart failure; infarction; remodeling; ultrasound; ventricular function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To test the usage of serial echocardiography in mice with induced myocardial infarct (MI) and to characterize the mouse model of MI. Methods: C57 mice underwent open-chest surgery to induce left coronary artery occlusion or sham-operation (SH). Echocardiography was performed before and at 1, 2.5, 6 and 9 weeks after surgery. Left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic dimensions (LVEDd, LVESd) and fractional shortening (FS) were measured. Haemodynamics was determined at week 9 by LV catheterization and hearts were examined morphologically. Results: Post-infarct mortality was 46% (10/22), of which, 70% died of acute heart failure or LV rupture within the first week. LV dimensions and FS remained stable in SH group (n=10) during the study period. In surviving MI mice (n=12), there was modest LV dilatation and fall in FS at week 1. Compared with week 0 values, there were progressive increase in LVEDd (+50 similar to+66%) and LVESd (+124 similar to+171%), and decline in FS (-53 similar to-73%) during the 2.5 similar to 9 week period. Infarcted mice also had lower LV systolic pressure (LVSP), dP/dt(max) and dP/dt(min) (all P<0.01 vs. SH group). Infarct size, LVSP and dP/dt significantly correlated with FS and LV dimensions (r=0.61 similar to 0.80, all P<0.01). Conclusions: LV remodeling and dysfunction in mice with MI are time-dependent processes and early remodeling seems associated with high risk of rupture and acute pump failure. Our findings provide a baseline description of this murine model and confirm echocardiography as a reliable means to serially assess changes of cardiac structure and function after MI. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据