4.5 Article

A cross-sectional study correlating lumbar spine degeneration with disability and pain

期刊

SPINE
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 218-223

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200001150-00013

关键词

disability; lumbar degeneration; pain; radiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Design. Cross-sectional design. Objectives. To investigate the correlation between degeneration in the lumbar spine and self-reported disability and pain levels in patients with and without a history of trauma. Summary of Background Data. The link between lumbar spine degeneration and low back pain remains controversial, as does the correlation between trauma nad spinal degeneration. Methods. Radiographic and questionnaire data were collected from 172 consecutive patients with low back pain. Back pain severity was measured using two scales: one for pain over the entire episode and one for pain during the previous week. All patients also completed the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire before radiography was performed. Further questions concerning the chronicity of symptoms and trauma were included. Results. Controlling for age, patients with low back pain with a history of trauma had a statistically significant increase in the severity of facet degeneration (P < 0.02) compared with nontrauma patients with low back pain. However, there was no difference in disability and pain scores between the trauma and nontrauma patients or between the genders. A weak correlation between pain and severity rating and the number of levels of degeneration and the severity of the degeneration at the disc and facets was noted. Conclusions. Patients with low back pain with a history of trauma had more severe facet arthrosis than do nontrauma patients with low back pain, but there were no differences in pain and disability. There was a weak correlation between the quantity and severity of lumbar degeneration with pain levels, but not with disability scores. These findings are discussed in the light of recent reports regarding the cervical spine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据