4.5 Article

Cationic peptide antimicrobials induce selective transcription of micF and osmY in Escherichia coli

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1463, 期 1, 页码 43-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00177-7

关键词

antibacterial peptides; antibiotic resistance; bacterial stasis; plasmolysis; osmotic

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM29703] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cationic antimicrobial peptides, such as polymyxin and cecropin, activated transcription of osm Y and micF in growing Escherichia coli independently of each other. The micF response required the presence of a functional rob gene. It is intriguing that in this and other assays an identical response profile was also seen with hyperosmotic salt or sucrose gradient, two of the most commonly used traditional food preservatives. The osm Y and micF transcription was not induced by hypoosmotic gradient, ionophoric peptides, uncouplers, or with other classes of membrane perturbing agents. The antibacterial peptides did not promote transcription of genes that respond to macromolecular or oxidative damage, fatty acid biosynthesis, heat shock, or depletion of proton or ion gradients. These and other results show that the antibacterial cationic peptides induce stasis in the early growth phase, and the transcriptional efficacy of antibacterial peptides correlates with their minimum inhibitory concentration, and also with their ability to mediate direct exchange of phospholipids between vesicles. The significance of these results is developed as the hypothesis that the cationic peptide antimicrobials stress growth of Gramnegative organisms by making contacts between the two phospholipid interfaces in the periplasmic space and prevent the hyperosmotic wrinkling of the cytoplasmic membrane. Broader significance of these results, and of the hypothesis that the peptide mediated contacts between the periplasmic phospholipid interfaces are the primary triggers, is discussed in relation to antibacterial resistance. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据