4.6 Article

Finding all periodic orbits of maps using Newton methods: sizes of basins

期刊

PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA
卷 135, 期 3-4, 页码 195-211

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00138-4

关键词

Newton methods; continuous Newton; trajectory; basin; dynamical systems; periodic orbits

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For a diffeomorphism F on R-2, it is possible to find periodic orbits of F of period k by applying Newton's method to the function F-k - I, where I is the identity function. (We actually use variants of Newton's method which are more robust than the traditional Newton's method.) For an initial point x, we iterate Newton's method many times. If the process converges to a point p which is a periodic point of F, we say x is in the Newton basin of p for period k, denoted by B(p, k). We investigate the size of the Newton basin and how it depends on p and k. In order to understand the basins of high period orbits, we choose p a periodic point of F with period k, then we investigate basins B(p, nk) for n = 1, 2, 3,.... We show that if p is an attracting orbit, then there is an open neighborhood of p that is in all the Newton basins B(p, nk) for all n. If p is a repelling periodic point of F, it is possible that p is the only point which is in all of the Newton basins B(p, nk) for all n. It is when p is a periodic saddle point of F that the Newton basin has its most interesting behavior. Our numerical data indicate that the area of the basin of a periodic saddle point p is proportional to lambda(c) where lambda is the magnitude of the unstable eigenvalue of DFk (p) and c is approximately -1 (c approximate to -0.84 in Fig. 5). For long periods (k more than about 20), many orbits of F have lambda so large that the basins are numerically undetectable. Our main result states that if p is a saddle point of F, the intersection of Newton basins B(p, nk) of p includes a segment of the local stable manifold of p. (C)2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据