4.6 Article

Photosensitized generation of singlet oxygen from vinyl linked benzo-crown-ether-bipyridyl ruthenium(II) complexes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 104, 期 2, 页码 192-202

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp991876z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photophysical properties of 10 substituted methoxybenzene or vinyl linked benzo-crown-ether-2,2'-bipyridyl ruthenium(II) complexes are reported. The lifetimes of the excited triplet metal to ligand charge transfer states, (MLCT)-M-3, of the complex ions are in the range 0.85 +/- 0.12 Cls with two exceptions where the lifetime drops to about half this value. The rate constants, k(q), for quenching in acetonitrile of the (MLCT)-M-3 states of these ruthenium complex ions by molecular oxygen, O-2(3 Sigma(g)(-)), and the variations in the efficiency, f(Delta)(T), with which excited singlet oxygen, O-2*((1)Delta(g)), is thereby produced are reported. The quenching rate constants are in the range 2.2-4.2 x 10(9) dm(3) mol(-1) s(-1), and efficiencies of singlet oxygen production are in the range 0.21-0.74. Those complexes with the highest values of k(q), tend to be those with lowest f(Delta)(T), values; that is, k(q) and f(Delta)(T) show a reasonable inverse correlation. The product k(q)f(Delta)(T) gives the rate constant for oxygen quenching with energy transfer to oxygen, k(q)(1) and k(q) - k(q)(1) gives the rate constant, k(q)(3) for oxygen quenching by any path which does not lead to energy transfer. The values of k(q)(1), k(q)(3) and k(q) are compared with those in the literature which are mainly available for organic sensitizers of singlet oxygen. The similarities and differences between these two classes of compounds are discussed taking into account the fact that ruthenium complex ions are Likely to show enhanced intersystem crossing, due to the heavy atom effect and the likely dependence of k(q)(1) and k(q)(3), and thereby the efficiencies of singlet oxygen production, on the energies of the excited 3MLCT states and on steric factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据