4.6 Article

DNA polymerase III proofreading mutants enhance the expansion and deletion of triplet repeat sequences in Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 3, 页码 2174-2184

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.3.2174

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES05508] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM52982] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS37554] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of mutations in the 3' to 5' exonucleolytic proofreading c-subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III on the genetic instabilities of the CGG.CCG and the CTG.CAG repeats that cause human hereditary neurological diseases was investigated. The dnaQ49(ts) and the mutD5 mutations destabilize the CGG.CCG repeats. The distributions of the deletion products indicate that slipped structures containing a small number of repeats in the loop mediate the deletion process. The CTG.CAG repeats were destabilized by the dnaQ49(ts) mutation by a process mediated by long hairpin loop structures (greater than or equal to 5 repeats). The mutD5 mutator strain stabilized the (CTG.CAG)(175) tract, which contained two interruptions. Since the mutD5 mutator strain has a saturated mismatch repair system, the stabilization is probably an indirect effect of the nonfunctional mismatch repair system in these strains. Shorter uninterrupted tracts expand readily in the mutD5 strain, presumably due to the greater stability of long CTG.CAG tracts (>100 repeats) in this strain. When parallel studies were conducted in minimal medium, where the mutD5 strain is defective in exonucleolytic proofreading but has a functional MMR system, both CTG.CAG and CGG.CCG repeats were destabilized, showing that the proofreading activity is essential for maintaining the integrity of TRS tracts. Thus, we conclude that the expansion and deletion of triplet repeats are enhanced by mutations that reduce the fidelity of replication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据