4.4 Article

Aggregation events occur prior to stable intermediate formation during refolding of interleukin 1β

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 575-583

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi991518m

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA09523] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R29 GM054038, GM54038, R01 GM054038] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A point mutation, lysine 97 --> isoleucine (K97I), in a surface loop in the beta-sheet protein interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta), exhibits increased levels of inclusion body (IB) formation relative to the wildtype protein (WT) when expressed in Escherichia coli. Despite the common observation that less stable proteins are often found in IBs, K97I is more stable than WT. We examined the folding pathway of the mutant and wild-type proteins at pH 6.5 and 25 degrees C with-manual-mixing and stopped-flow optical spectroscopy to determine whether changes in the properties of transiently populated species in vitro correlate with the observation of increased aggregation in vivo. The refolding reactions of the WT and K97I proteins are both described by three exponential processes. Two exponential processes characterize fast events (0.1-1.0 s) in folding while the third exponential process correlates with a slow (70 s) single pathway to and from the native state. The K97I replacement affects the earlier steps in the refolding pathway. Aggregation, absent in the WT refolding reaction, occurs in K97I above a critical protein concentration of 18 mu M. This observation is consistent with an initial nucleation step mediating protein aggregation. Stopped-flow kinetic studies of the K97I aggregation process demonstrate that K97I aggregates most rapidly during the earliest refolding times, when unfolded protein conformers remain highly populated and the concentration of folding intermediates is low. Folding and aggregation studies together support a model in which the formation of stable folding intermediates afford protection against further K97I aggregation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据