4.3 Article

Iron N-(2-hydroxy acetophenone) glycinate (FeNG), a non-toxic glutathione depletor circumvents doxorubicin resistance in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells in vivo

期刊

BIOMETALS
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 149-163

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10534-011-9493-7

关键词

Multi drug resistance; Glutathione; Iron complex; Resistance modifying agent

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi [3/2/2/200/2009NCD-III, 5/13/53/2008NCD-III]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) reduces intracellular anticancer drug accumulation either by co transporting them with glutathione (GSH) or extruding drug-GSH conjugates outside of the cell. Thus, MRP1 confers multidrug resistance (MDR) and worsen successful chemotherapeutic treatment against cancer. Although the exact mechanism of MRP1 involved in MDR remains unknown, the elevated level of intracellular GSH is considered as a key factor responsible for MDR in cancer. Hence the quest for non-toxic molecules that are able to deplete intracellular GSH has profound importance to subdue MDR. The present preclinical study depicts the resistance reversal potentiality of an iron complex; viz. Ferrous N-(2-hydroxy acetophenone) glycinate (FeNG) developed by us in doxorubicin resistant Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC/Dox) cells. FeNG potentiate cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin on EAC/Dox cells ex vivo and also increases the survivability EAC/Dox bearing Swiss albino mice in vivo as well. Moreover, in vivo administration of FeNG significantly depletes intracellular GSH with ensuant increase in doxorubicin concentration in EAC/Dox cells without alternation of MRP1 expression. In addition, intra-peritoneal (i.p.) application of FeNG in normal or EAC/Dox bearing mice does not cause any systemic toxicity in preliminary trials in mouse Ehrlich ascites carcinoma model. Therefore, the present report provides evidence that FeNG may be a promising new resistance modifying agent against drug resistant cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据