4.6 Article

Thioredoxin-dependent hydroperoxide peroxidase activity of bacterioferritin comigratory protein (BCP) as a new member of the thiol-specific antioxidant protein (TSA)/alkyl hydroperoxide peroxidase C (AhpC) family

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 4, 页码 2924-2930

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2924

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Escherichia coli bacterioferritin comigratory protein (BCP), a putative bacterial member of the TSA/AhpC family, was characterized as a thiol peroxidase, BCP showed a thioredoxin-dependent thiol peroxidase activity, BCP preferentially reduced linoleic: acid hydroperoxide rather than H2O2 and t-butyl hydroperoxide with the use of thioredoxin as an in vivo immediate electron donor. The value of V-max/K-m of BCP for Linoleic acid hydroperoxide was calculated to be 5-fold higher than that for H2O2, implying that ECP has a selective capability to reduce linoleic acid hydroperoxide. Replacement of Cys-45 with serine resulted in the complete loss of thiol peroxidase activity; suggesting that BCP is a new bacterial member of TSA/AhpC family having a conserved cysteine as the primary site of catalysis, BCP exists as a monomer, and its functional Cys-45 appeared to exist as cysteine sulfenic acid. The expression level of BCP gradually elevated during exponential growth until mid-log phase growth, beyond which the expression level was decreased. BCP was induced 3-fold by the oxidative stress given by changing the growth conditions from the anaerobic to aerobic culture. Bcp null mutant grew more slowly than its wild type in aerobic culture and showed the hypersensitivity toward various oxidants such as H2O2, t-butyl hgdroperoxide, and linoleic acid hydroperoxide. The peroxide hypersensitivity of the null mutant could be complemented by the expression of bcp gene. Taken together, these data suggest that BCP is a new member of thioredoxin-dependent TSA/AhpC family, acting as a general hydroperoxide peroxidase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据