4.3 Article

Cooperative folding of tau peptide by coordination of group IIB metal cations during heparin-induced aggregation

期刊

BIOMETALS
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 361-372

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10534-011-9505-7

关键词

Aggregation; Conformation; Coordination; Group IIB metals; Tau protein

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20871094, 20901060, 20472065]
  2. foundation of the MOE key laboratory of Bioinorganic and Synthetic Chemistry, Sun Yet-Sen University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The group IIB elements, especially Cd(II) and Hg(II), are increasingly considered as potential environmental neurotoxins. This study demonstrates that the Alzheimer's tau fragment R2, corresponding to the second repeat of the microtubule-binding domain, can bind to Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II). Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments suggest that the most likely coordination site is the thiol group of Cys291, and this is further confirmed by a control experiment using a C291A mutant peptide. Circular dichroism spectrum reveals that the coordination of group IIB cations, especially Hg(II), can induce pronounced conformational conversions in natively unfolded R2, from random coil to other ordered structures. ThS fluorescence assays and electron microscopy indicate that the group IIB cations promote heparin-induced aggregation of R2, giving relatively small R2 filaments. The efficiency in promoting aggregation, as well as inducing conformational conversion, varies strongly with the cation's polarizability. Based on these results, a model is proposed in which the cooperative folding of R2 through cross-bridging of group IIB cations is suggested to be a key factor in promoting aggregation, in addition to the effective neutralization of coulombic charge-charge repulsion by heparin, the poly-anion inducer. Our results provide clues to understanding the potential pathogenic role of group IIB metals in the development of neurofibrillary tangles, a typical hallmark of Alzheimer's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据