4.6 Article

Lipase immobilisation: an equilibrium study of lipases immobilised on hydrophobic and hydrophilic/hydrophobic supports

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 207-215

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/S1369-703X(99)00050-9

关键词

lipase immobilisation; equilibrium; hydrophobic; hydrophilic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the enzyme-support equilibrium behaviour in immobilised lipase biocatalysts. Equilibrium data determines the maximum enzyme up-take by unit weight of support. Four lipases were immobilised on two polymeric supports, respectively. They were Lipase PS from Pseudomonas, Lipolase 100L from Humicola, SP871 from Rhizomucor miehel and QL from Alcaligenes. The supports were Accurel EP100 (a polypropylene material) and 45SAA (a polypropylene/silica composite). Experimentally, equilibrium was expressed in terms of lipase loading (LU/g support) versus residual lipase concentration (LU/dm(3)). Activity, efficiency and operational stability of the immobilised lipases were assayed by solvent-free esterification of oleic acid and octanol. Equilibrium data were modelled by the Langmuir, Freundlich and Redlich-Peterson formulae. It was found that Lipolase 100L/Accurel, PS/45SAA and SP871/45SAA systems conformed to the Langmuir behaviour, while Lipase PS/Accurel and SP871/Accurel systems followed the Freundlich behaviour and Lipolase 100L/45SAA, QL/45SAA and QL/Accurel EP100 resembled Redlich-Peterson behaviour. Whereas immobilisation on Accurel EP100 resulted in classical equilibrium isotherms with all four lipases, immobilisation on support 45SAA resulted in two-plateau equilibrium curves which included a step change in the isotherm for all lipases studied, except for SP871. Quantitatively, for 1 g lipase, Accurel and 45SAA had a maximum capacity of 140 and 260 kLU for PS, 112 and 550 kLU for Lipolase 100L, 320 and 800 kLU for SP871 and 18 and 29 kLU for QL, respectively. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据