4.6 Article

The importance of having high glutathione (GSH) level after bovine in vitro maturation on embryo development:: Effect of β-mercaptoethanol, cysteine and cystine

期刊

THERIOGENOLOGY
卷 53, 期 3, 页码 761-771

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00278-2

关键词

maturation media; IVM; oxidative stress; aminoacid transport; cytoplasmic maturation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supplementation of IVM medium with cysteamine, beta-mercaptoethanol, cysteine and cystine induced bovine oocyte glutathione (GSH) synthesis, but only the effect of cysteamine on the developmental competence of these oocytes was tested. During IVM of sheep oocytes, cysteamine but not beta-mercaptoethanol increased embryo development. However, it is not known how long the high intracellular oocyte GSH levels obtained after IVM with thiol compounds, can be maintained. Thus, the present study was carried out to evaluate the effects of supplementing maturation medium with 100 mu M beta-mercaptoethanol, 0.6 mM cysteine and 0.6 mM cystine on 1) intracellular GSH level after IVM, 2) after IVF, 3) in 6 to 8-cell embryos and 4) on embryo development. In oocytes after IVM and in presumptive zygotes after IVF, intracellular GSH levels were significantly higher in the treated groups (P<0.05). While, GSH content in 6 to 8-cell embryos was similar among treatment groups (P>0.05). Differences in cleavage rates and the percentage of embryos that developed to morula and blastocyst stages were significantly higher (P< 0.05) for treated oocytes than for those matured in the control medium. We conclude from the results that the high intracellular GSH levels after induction of GSH synthesis in bovine IVM by thiol compounds remain during IVF and are still present at the beginning of IVC, improving developmental rates. Moreover, the results indicate that this metabolic pathway is an important component of the cytoplasmic maturation process that affects the subsequent steps of in vitro embryo production. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据