4.4 Article

Persistent Cryptococcus neoformans pulmonary infection in the rat is associated with intracellular parasitism, decreased inducible nitric oxide synthase expression, and altered antibody responsiveness to cryptococcal polysaccharide

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 832-838

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.2.832-838.2000

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL059842] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI44641, AIO1300] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH055477, MH55477] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fungal pathogens are notorious for causing chronic and latent infections, but the mechanism by which they evade the immune response is poorly understood. A major limitation in the study of chronic fungal infection has been the lack of suitable animal models where the infection is controlled and yet persists. Pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection in rats results in a diffuse pneumonitis that resolves without dissemination or scarring except for the persistence of interstitial and subpleural granulomas that harbor viable cryptococci inside macrophages and epithelioid cells. Infected rats are asymptomatic but remain infected for as long as 18 months after inoculation with C. neoformans, Containment of infection is associated with granuloma formation that can be partially abrogated by glucocorticoid administration, Using this model, we identified several features associated with persistent infection in the rat lung, including (i) localization of C, neoformans to discrete, well-organized granulomas; (ii) intracellular persistence of C, neoformans within macrophages and epithelioid cells; (iii) reduced inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by granulomas harboring C. neoformans; and (iv) reduced antibody responses to cryptococcal polysaccharide. The results show that maintenance of persistent infection is associated with downregulation of both cellular and humoral immune responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据