3.8 Article

Left ventricular morphology in junior and master resistance trained athletes

期刊

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 349-352

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200002000-00013

关键词

athletes heart; echocardiography; resistance training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The objective of this cross-sectional investigation was to assess the effects of short (<5 yr) versus long-term (greater than or equal to 18 yr) resistance training (RT) on left ventricular (LV) dimensions and mass. Methods: The subjects for this study were 20 elite male powerlifters (8 junior athletes [JA], mean +/- SD, age: 21.1 +/- 1.2 yr and 12 master athletes [MA], age: 46.0 +/- 5.5 yr) and 19 age-matched male controls (8 young controls [YC], age: 21.8 +/- 2.8 yr and 11 middle-aged controls [MAC], age: 46.8 +/- 4.4 yr). Two-dimensionally guided transthoracic M-mode echocardiograms were performed at rest to quantify LV systolic and diastolic cavity dimension (LVIDs and LVIDd, respectively), ventricular septal wall thickness (VST), posterior wall thickness (PWT), LV mass (LVM), and LV systolic function as measured as fractional shortening (FS). Results: Short- or long-term RT was not associated with a significant alteration in LVIDd (JA: 53.2 +/- 4.5 mm, YC: 52.1 +/- 3.7 mm, MA: 53.0 +/- 5.1 mm, MAC: 51.8 +/- 4.4 mm), LVIDs (JA: 33.5 +/- 4.8 mm, YC: 32.9 +/- 3.4 mm, MA: 33.0 +/- 4.4 mm, MAC: 31.4 +/- 3.7 mm), VST (JA: 9.4 +/- 0.9 mm, YC: 9.4 +/- 0.9 mm, MA: 9.4 +/- 1.6 mm, MAC: 9.7 +/- 0.9 mm), PWT (JA: 9.2 +/- 0.9 mm, YC: 9.4 +/- 0.9 mm, MA: 9.0 +/- 1.1 mm, MAC: 9.5 +/- 1.0 mm), LVM (JA: 184.6 +/- 36.1 g, YC: 179.0 +/- 26.5 g, MA, 183.3 +/- 58.1 g, MAC: 184.1 +/- 38.1 g), or FS (JA: 0.37 +/- 0.1%, YC: 0.37 +/- 0.05%, MA: 0.38 +/- 0.1%, MAC: 0.40 +/- 0.04%). Conclusions: These findings suggest that short or long-term RT as performed by elite junior and master powerlifters does not alter LV morphology or systolic function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据