4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Determinants of unexplained antepartum fetal deaths

期刊

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 215-221

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00536-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess fetal, maternal, and pregnancy-related determinants of unexplained antepartum fetal death. Methods: We conducted a hospital-based cohort study of 84,294 births weighing 500 g or more from 1961-1974 and 1978-1996. Unexplained fetal deaths were defined as fetal deaths occurring before labor without evidence of significant fetal, maternal, or placental pathology. Results: One hundred ninety-six unexplained antepartum fetal deaths accounted for 27.2% of 721 total fetal deaths. Two thirds of the unexplained fetal deaths occurred after 35 weeks' gestation. The following factors were independently associated with unexplained fetal death: maternal prepregnancy weight greater than 68 kg (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85, 4.68), birth weight ratio (defined as ratio of birth weight to mean weight for gestational age) between 0.75 and 0.85 (OR 2.77; 95% CI 1.48, 5.18) or over 1.15 (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.26, 4.44), fewer than four antenatal visits in women whose fetuses died at 37 weeks or later (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.08, 4.52), primiparity (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.26, 2.40), parity of three or more (OR 2.01; 95% CH 1.26, 3.20), low socioeconomic status (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.14, 2.22), cord loops (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.04, 2.97) and, for the 1978-1996 period only, maternal age 40 years or more (On 3.69; 95% CI 1.28, 10.58). Trimester of first antenatal visit, low maternal weight, postdate pregnancy, fetal-to-placental weight ratio, fetal sex, previous fetal death, previous abortion, cigarette smoking, and alcohol use were not significantly associated with unexplained fetal death. Conclusion: In this study, we identified several factors associated with an increased risk of unexplained fetal death. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据