4.6 Article

The endogenous pathway is a major route for deep sternal wound infection

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 154-160

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00327-4

关键词

deep sternal wound infection; pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; DNA fingerprint analysis; risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Deep wound infections pose an increasing problem in cardiac surgery patients. Prospective infection monitoring is thus a means of identifying possible risk factors. Methods: Within a period of 5 months, a total of 376 adult patients, 260 men and 116 women, with a mean age of 62.6 years (range 18-88), underwent coronary bypass grafting (n = 281) or other cardiac surgery procedures (n = 95). Nasal cultures were taken preoperatively from every patient, as well as cultures of the wound during surgery and when dressings were changed thereafter. In addition, nasal cultures were taken from all the medical and nursing staff. To differentiate endogenous and exogenous infection pathways, DNA fingerprint analysis was performed. Results: A total of 38 patients (10.1%) developed a wound infection, in 14 patients this happened to be a deep wound infection, in 24 patients a superficial one. Five sternal wound infections were associated with mediastinitis (1.3%). The occurrence of a wound infection overall resulted in prolonged hospitalization (29.4 +/- 24 vs. 11.9 +/- 6.9 days, P = 0.001), but not in increased hospital mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%). Obesity, diabetes mellitus and nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus proved to be independent risk factors with an odds ratio of 2.07, 2.26 and 2.28, respectively. In all but one of the sternal colonizations with S. aureus, DNA fingerprint analysis demonstrated an identical pattern of S. aureus from the patient's nose and sternum, indicating an endogenous infection pathway. Conclusions: The determination of the endogenous pathway for severe wound infection makes prevention possible by means of preoperative local S. aureus eradication. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据