4.7 Article

L-ascorbic acid and L-galactose are sources for oxalic acid and calcium oxalate in Pistia stratiotes

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 433-440

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00448-3

关键词

Pistia stratiotes; Araceae; L-ascorbic acid; calcium oxalate; crystal idioblast cells; D-erythorbic acid; L-galactose; glycolate; oxalic acid

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-45248] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Axenic Pistia stratiotes L. plants were pulse-chase labeled with [C-14]oxalic acid, L-[1-C-14]ascorbic acid, L-[6-C-14]ascorbic acid, D-[1-C-14]erythorbic acid, L-[1-C-14]galactose, or [1-C-14]glycolate. Specific radioactivities of L-ascorbic acid (AsA), free oxalic acid (OxA) and calcium oxalate (CaOx) in labeled plants were compared. Samples of leaf tissue were fixed for microautoradiography and examined by confocal microscopy. Results demonstrate a biosynthetic role for AsA as precursor of OxA and its crystalline deposition product, CaOx, in idioblast cells of P. stratiotes and support the recent discovery of Wheeler, Jones and Smirnoff (Wheeler, G.L., Jones M.A., Br Smirnoff, N. (1998). The biosynthetic pathway of Vitamin C in higher plants. Nature, 393, 365-369) that L-galactose is a key intermediate in the conversion of D-glucose to AsA in plants. D-[1-C-14]Erythorbic acid (a diastereomeric analog of AsA) is utilized also by P. stratiotes as a precursor of OxA and its calcium salt deposition product in idioblasts. Labeled OxA is rapidly incorporated into CaOx in idioblasts, but microautoradiography shows there is also significant incorporation of carbon from OxA into other components of growing cells, contrary to the dogma that OxA is a relatively stable end product of metabolism. Glycolate is a poor substrate for synthesis of OxA and CaOx formation, further establishing AsA as the immediate precursor in the synthesis of OxA used for calcium precipitation in crystal idioblasts. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据