4.8 Article

Antibacterial silver-containing silica glass prepared by sol-gel method

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 393-398

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00201-X

关键词

silver; silica glass; sol-gel method; chemical durability; antibacterial property

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, various inorganic antibacterial materials containing silver have been developed and some of them are in commercial use. Colorless and more chemically durable materials which slowly release the silver ion for a long period are, however, desirable to be developed far medical applications such as composite resin for dental restoration. In the present study, Si(OC2H5)(4), Al(NO3)(3). 9H(2)O, AgNO3, HNO3, C2H5OH and H2O solutions with various Al/Ag atomic ratios under a constant Si/Ag atomic ratio of 1/0.023 were kept at 40 degrees C for gelation and drying. Thus obtained gels were pulverized into fine powders with average particle size of approximately 10 mu m and then heat-treated at 900-1000 degrees C for 2 h. For the composition Al/Ag = 0, a yellow-colored glass was formed, since the silver existed in the form of metallic colloids in the glass. However, for the compositions Al/Ag greater than or equal to 1, colorless glasses were successfully obtained, since the silver existed in the form of Ag+ ions in the glasses. For the composition Al/Ag = 0, the silver ions got released rapidly into the water, whereas, for the compositions Al/Ag greater than or equal to 1, they gradually got released into the water at a controlled rate. A composite of the obtained powders with Al/Ag atomic ratio of I with Bis-GMA/TEGDMA in 70:30 weight ratio showed excellent antibacterial property. The sol-gel derived silica glass powders containing silver with compositions Al/Ag greater than or equal to I are believed to be useful as an antibacterial material for medical applications such as filler of composite resin for dental restoration. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据