4.6 Article

Norepinephrine facilitates inhibitory transmission in substantia gelatinosa of adult rat spinal cord (Part 2) - Effects on somatodendritic sites of GABAergic neurons

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 92, 期 2, 页码 485-492

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200002000-00031

关键词

antinociception; blind patch; clamp recording; intracellular recording; IPSC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It has been reported previously that norepinephrine, when applied to the spinal cord dorsal horn, excites a subpopulation of dorsal horn neurons, presumably inhibitory interneurons, in the current study, the authors tested whether norepinephrine could activate inhibitory interneurons, specifically those that are ''GABAergic.'' Methods: A transverse slice was obtained from a segment of the lumbar spinal cord isolated from adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from substantia gelatinosa neurons using the blind patch-clamp technique. The effects of norepinephrine on spontaneous GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents were studied. Results: In the majority of substantia gelatinosa neurons tested, norepinephrine (10-60 mu M) significantly increased both the frequency and the amplitude of GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents, These increases were blocked by tetrodotoxin (1 mu M). The effects of norepinephrine mere mimicked by the alpha(1)-receptor agonist phenylephrine (10-80 mu M) and inhibited by the alpha(1)-receptor antagonist WB-4101 (0.5 mu M). Primary-afferent-evoked polysynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials or excitatory postsynaptic currents in wide-dynamic-range neurons of the deep dorsal horn were also attenuated by phenylephrine (40 mu M). Conclusion: The observations suggest that GABAergic interneurons possess somatodendritic alpha(1) receptors, and activation of these receptors excites inhibitory interneurons, The alpha(1) actions reported herein may contribute to the analgesic action of intrathecally administered phenylephrine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据