4.5 Article

Rhizobia can induce nodules in white clover by hijacking mature cortical cells activated during lateral root development

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 170-182

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.2.170

关键词

auxin transport inhibition; cytokinin; lateral root formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined a range of responses of root cortical cells to Rhizobium sp. inoculation to investigate why rhizobia preferentially nodulate legume roots in the zone of emerging root hairs, but generally fail to nodulate the mature root, We tested whether the inability to form nodules in the mature root is due to a lack of plant flavonoids to induce the bacterial genes required for nodulation or a failure of mature cortical cells to respond to Rhizobium spp, When rhizobia were inoculated in the zone of emerging root hairs, changes in beta-glucuronidase (GUS) expression from an auxin-responsive promoter (GH3), expression from three chalcone synthase promoters, and the accumulation of specific flavonoid compounds occurred in cortical cells prior to nodule formation, Rhizobia failed to induce these responses when inoculated in the mature root, even when co-inoculated with nod gene-inducing flavonoids. However, mature root hairs remained responsive to rhizobia and could support infection thread formation. This suggests that a deficiency in signal transduction is the reason for nodulation failure in the mature root. However, nodules could be initiated in the mature root at sites of lateral root emergence. A comparison between lateral root and nodule formation showed that similar patterns of GH3:gusA expression, chalcone synthase gene expression, and accumulation of a particular flavonoid compound occurred in the cortical cells involved in both processes. The results suggest that rhizobia can hijack cortical cells next to lateral root emergence sites because some of the early responses required for nodule formation have already been activated by the plant in those cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据