4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Expression of complement regulatory proteins - CD 35, CD 46, CD 55, and CD 59 - in benign and malignant endometrial tissue

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 176-182

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5614

关键词

endometrial cancer; complement receptor type 1 (CR1, CD35); membrane cofactor protein (MCP, CD46); decay-accelerating factor (DAF, CD55); protectin (CD59)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Complement system plays an important role in host defense mechanisms against microorganisms and tumor cells. To protect themselves from autologous complement-mediated damage, normal host tissues express cell membrane-associated complement regulatory proteins (CRPs). To investigate whether neoplastic endometrial tissues overexpress these proteins to escape complement damage, we examined the distribution of complement receptor type 1 (CR1, CD35), membrane cofactor protein (MCP, CD46), decay-accelerating factor (DAF, CD55), and protectin (MACIF, CD59) on frozen endometrial tissue samples. Methods. A total of 54 endometrial tissue samples were collected. Cryosections were obtained of 31 benign and 23 malignant tissue specimens. Tissue sections were stained by immunohistochemical staining procedure using specific antibodies and employing the avidin-biotin technique. Quantitation of the protein content of these CRPs was determined using the Samba 4000 image analysis system. Results. For all four of the CRPs studied, a statistically significant difference in protein expression between the benign and malignant endometrial tissue specimens (P < 0.0001) was observed. Conclusions. Overexpression of all the CRPs studied (CD35, CD46, CD55, CD59) was observed in the malignant as compared with the benign endometrial tissues. The upregulation of these CRPs may promote resistance of the endometrial malignant tissue to complement-mediated damage, thereby allowing the tumor cells to escape from cytolysis and thus promoting carcinogenesis. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据