4.5 Article

Genetic analysis of group composition and breeding system in a wild common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) population

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 1-20

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005411227810

关键词

microsatellites; common marmosets; mating system; paternity; relatedness

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We established pedigree relations in three wild common marmoset social groups for which observational data were available, together with genotypes of some individuals from neighboring groups. Relatedness of 40 individuals were based on Il microsatellite loci amplified from nDNA obtained noninvasively from plucked hair. The wild marmosets were only half as variable as a captive population characterized previously: 2-6 alleles/locus; H-o = 0.41 and H-E = 0.35. Parentage exclusion probabilities were 61.8% for an offspring and one alleged parent and 90.7% for an offspring with one confirmed and one alleged parent. Each group (n = 5-14 individuals) had two breeding females and 22 adult males. Within each group the infants and reproductively inactive adults were closely related to at least the breeding females; the latter were related to each other as closely as mother/infant pairs or sisters. Relatedness of adult males was lower indicating recent intergroup dispersal. Genetic data confirm Callithrix jacchus live in relatively stable extended family groups of closely related individuals. Matings occurred preferentially among the least related adults and most infants were fathered by the dominant male. The generic data are consistent with polygynmonandry as are the field observations. Callithrix have variable mating systems, ranging from monogamy to polyandry to polygyny within social groups pins extragroup copulations; our data provide no evidence for polyandry and are inconclusive with respect to extragroup paternity. Nevertheless noninvasive multilocus genotyping methods will resolve these questions when longer-term studies of entire populations are undertaken.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据