4.5 Article

Regression of chronic L-NAME-treatment-induced left ventricular hypertrophy:: Effect of captopril

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmcc.1999.1071

关键词

nitric oxide; captopril; L-NAME; ACE; collagenous proteins; myofibrillar proteins; hypertension; left ventricular hypertrophy; regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term administration of N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) induces development of NO-deficient hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. In this work, we examined the effect of spontaneous and captopril-induced recovery on LV hypertrophy and protein composition in rats with developed L-NAME-induced hypertension. Four groups of rats were investigated: control; L-NAME 40 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks (L-NAME); L-NAME 40 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks followed by 3-week. spontaneous recovery (L-NAME+R); L-NAME 40 mg/kg/ day for 4 weeks followed by 3 weeks of captopril treatment at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day (L-NAME+C). LV hypertrophy in the L-NAME group was associated with an increase in content and concentration of left ventricular DNA and RNA, concentration of metabolic proteins (MP) and soluble collagenous proteins (SCP). Spontaneous recovery period reduced the hypertension, without regression of LV hypertrophy. Left ventricular DNA and RNA content were increased in the L-NAME+R group. In this group, concentrations of MP, contractile proteins (CP), and collagenous proteins did not differ from those in the L-NAME group. Captopril treatment caused total regression of hypertension and LV hypertrophy and decreased both content and concentration of DNA and RNA, as well as the contests of MP, CP and SCP nu the L-NAME group. However, after captopril treatment, concentration of collagenous and non-collagenous protein fractions remained increased nu control. We conclude that spontaneous regression of L-NAME-induced hypertension is not associated with regression of LV hypertrophy, LV hypertrophy was regressed only in captopril-treated animals. (C) 2000 Academic Press

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据