4.8 Article

Aerobic digestion of pharmaceutical and domestic wastewater sludges at ambient temperature

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 725-734

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00234-1

关键词

sludge stabilisation; aerobic digestion; ambient temperature; pharmaceutical wastewater

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of aerobic digestion for pharmaceutical and domestic sludges was studied in order to determine the best operational conditions for digestion and to assess the need for pH stabilisation. Sludge concentrations ranging from 1500 to 11000 m l(-1) and from 4500 to 22000 mg l(-1) were tested with representative domestic and pharmaceutical waste activated sludges, respectively. Temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS), settled sludge volume, sludge volume index (SVI), stirred sludge volume index (SSVI), specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR), sludge capillary suction time (CST), supernatant biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), supernatant chemical oxygen demand (COD), supernatant turbidity, sludge Roc morphology and biodiversity were all monitored. The reductions achieved in settled sludge volume, MLSS and MLVSS were higher for domestic than for pharmaceutical sludges. A significant improvement in domestic sludge settleability (due to a change in flee morphology) appeared between 14 and 21d of aerobic digestion, followed by an increase in supernatant turbidity and a decrease in sludge filterability Eventually, pH stabilisation at 6.5 improved sludge characteristics, leading to a clearer recycled supernatant and a better sludge filterability. No odour or foam problems were recorded. The aerobic digestion performance achieved was a reduction of 42-53% MLSS, 53-64% MLVSS. 66-93% SOUR, 53-81% settled sludge volume and full stabilisation for domestic sludges: while fur pharmaceutical sludges reductions of 4-18% MLSS, 6-25% MLVSS, and 64-79% SOUR were achieved with full stabilisation. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据