4.7 Article

Near-infrared line imaging of the circumnuclear starburst ring in NGC 7771

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 529, 期 2, 页码 853-858

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/308327

关键词

galaxies : individual (NGC 7771); galaxies : starburst; infrared : galaxies; stars : formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present high spatial resolution near-infrared broadband JHK images and, for the first time, Br gamma 2.1661 mu m and H-2 1-0 S(1) 2.122 mu m emission-line images of the circumnuclear star-forming ring (major axis diameter 7 = 2 kpc) in the starburst galaxy NGC 7771. These data are used to investigate the morphology and extinction of the starburst ring and to study its star-forming properties and history by comparing the observed quantities with an evolutionary population synthesis model. The clumpy morphology of NGC 7771 varies strongly with wavelength, as a result of the combination of extinction (for which we derive an average value of A(V) = 2.8), emission from hot dust and red supergiants, and several stellar generations in the ring. Also, the ellipticity and the position angle of the ring depend on the wavelength. The starburst ring in NGC 7771 exhibits small Br gamma equivalent widths. Assuming a constant star formation model with M-u = 100 M. results in very long lifetimes of the star-forming regions (up to 1 Gyr), in disagreement with the clumpy near-infrared morphology and the observed radio spectral index of NGC 7771. This situation is only slightly remedied by assuming a reduced upper mass cutoff (M-u = 30 M.), resulting in ages between 8 and 180 Myr. We prefer an instantaneous star formation model with M-u = 100 M., which can explain the derived Br gamma equivalent widths if a single starburst occurred 6-7 Myr ago. The main excitation mechanism of the molecular gas, based on the observed S(1)/Br gamma ratio, appears to be excitation by UV radiation from hot young stars. We derive M similar or equal to 1900 M. for the mass of the excited H-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据