3.8 Article

Degradation of pentachlorophenol by Phanerochaete chrysosporium:: intermediates and reactions involved

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-UK
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 405-413

出版社

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-146-2-405

关键词

pentachlorophenol; reductive dechlorination; hydroxylation; Phanerochaete chrysosporium; lignin and manganese peroxidases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Under nitrogen-limiting, secondary metabolic conditions, the lignin-degrading basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium rapidly degrades pentachlorophenol. The pathway for the degradation of pentachlorophenol has been elucidated by the characterization of fungal metabolites and oxidation products generated by purified lignin peroxidase (LiP) and manganese peroxidase (MnP). The multi-step pathway is initiated by a LiP- or MnP-catalysed oxidative dechlorination reaction to produce tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone. Under primary or secondary metabolic conditions, the quinone is further degraded by two parallel pathways with cross-links. The quinone is reduced to tetrachlorodihydroxybenzene. which can undergo four successive reductive dechlorinations to produce 1,4-hydroquinone, and the latter is o-hydroxylated to form the final aromatic metabolite, 1,2,4-trihydroxybenzene. Alternatively, the tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone is converted, either enzymically or nonenzymically, to 2,3,5-trichlorotrihydroxybenzene, which undergoes successive reductive dechlorinations to produce 1,2,4-trihydroxybenzene. Finally, at several points, hydroxylation reactions convert chlorinated dihydroxybenzenes to chlorinated trihydroxybenzenes, linking the two pathways at each of these steps. Presumably, the 1,2.4-trihydroxybenzene produced in each pathway is ring-cleaved with subsequent degradation to CO2. In contrast to the oxidative dechlorination step, the reductive dechlorinations and hydroxylations occur during both primary and secondary metabolic growth. Apparently, all five chlorine atoms are removed from the substrate prior to ring cleavage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据