4.7 Article

Continuous relation between left ventricular mass and cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 580-586

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.35.2.580

关键词

echocardiography; hypertension, arterial; hypertension, essential; hypertrophy; morbidity; mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The detection of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy on echocardiography is a powerful risk indicator in essential hypertension. However, the prognostic impact of LV mass values within the normal range and the shape of the relation between LV mass and prognosis remain unclear. Thus, 1925 white subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension underwent off-therapy 24-hour blood pressure monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. During 4.0+/-2 years of follow-up, there were 181 major cardiovascular events (2.4/100 patient-years) and 49 deaths from all causes. In the 5 gender-specific quintiles of LV mass distribution (partition values: 92, 105, 120, and 138 g/m(2) in men and 79, 91, 102, and 116 g/m(2) in women), cardiovascular event rates were 0.8, 1.7, 2.2, 2.9, and 4.3 per 100 patient-years. After adjustment for several risk factors, including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, the relative risk (RR) of developing a cardiovascular event increased progressively from the first quintile (RR 1) to the second (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8 to 3.1), third (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.0), fourth (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 5.8), and fifth (RR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8 to 6.8) quintile. For all-cause death, the RR in the fifth quintile compared with the first quintile was 4.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 13.4). In conclusion, the powerful relation between LV mass and risk of cardiovascular disease in subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension is continuous over a wide range of LV mass values, even below the current upper normal Limits. The relation remains significant after control for traditional risk factors, including ambulatory blood pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据