4.6 Article

Risks of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with pregestational diabetes mellitus

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-YEAR BOOK INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70225-0

关键词

class B-R diabetes; neonatal outcome; preeclampsia

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD21414, HD19897, HD21410] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to determine the frequencies of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with pregestational diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observation of pregnancy outcomes among 462 women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (White classes B-F) and singleton pregnancies who were enrolled in a multicenter trial to compare low-dose aspirin with placebo for preeclampsia prevention. The main outcome measures were preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Among 462 women with pregestational diabetes, 92 (20%) had preeclampsia. Preeclampsia frequency rose significantly with increasing severity of diabetes according to White classification (class B, 11%; class C, 22%; class D, 21%; class R plus class F, 36%; P < .0001). Preeclampsia was also more common among women who had proteinuria at baseline (28% vs 18%; odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.01). Frequency of preterm delivery at <35 weeks' gestation rose greatly with increasing severity of diabetes (P = .0002). Women with proteinuria at baseline were significantly more likely to be delivered at <35 weeks' gestation (29% vs 13%; odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.6) and to have small-for-gestational-age infants (14% vs 3%; odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-17.7), and they were less likely to have large-for-gestational-age infants (14% vs 40%, odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.5). CONCLUSION: Among women with pregestational diabetes mellitus, the frequency of preeclampsia rose with increasing severity of diabetes. Proteinuria early in pregnancy was associated with marked increases in adverse neonatal outcomes independent of preeclampsia development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据