4.5 Article

The effects of drought on the Solidago altissima-Eurosta solidaginis-natural enemy complex:: population dynamics, local extirpations, and measures of selection intensity on gall size

期刊

OECOLOGIA
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 240-248

出版社

SPRINGER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/PL00008852

关键词

drought; Eurosta solidaginis; gall inducer; local extirpation; tri-trophic level

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental catastrophes, such as severe drought, can reduce host-plant quality and/or abundance, which in turn decrease levels of herbivore populations. Such changes in herbivore populations affect populations of their natural enemies. As part of a long-term field experiment (1983-1991), galls of Eurosta solidaginis from 16 fields in central Pennsylvania were systematically collected from goldenrod ramets. Galls were dissected to compare the occurrence of E. solidaginis mortality caused by its natural enemies in 2 drought years (1988, 1991) with 5 pre-drought years (1983-1987) and 2 postdrought years (1989-1990). Gall diameters were significantly smaller in both drought years and early larval death significantly decreased E. solidaginis survivorship in the first drought year. Of the natural enemies, the parasitoid wasp Eurytoma gigantea caused significant selection for larger gall size in all pre-drought years, the 1991 drought, and both post-drought years, due to its differential attack of smaller galls. In spite of drought-induced small gall size in 1988, there was negligible selection on gall size by natural enemies. However, populations of E. solidaginis did suffer local extirpations at nine of the 16 fields during the first drought year and population recoveries of the gall inducer and natural enemies varied among fields in the post-drought years. As a consequence of reduced herbivore abundance in drought and post-drought years, some natural-enemy populations were absent. Drought therefore drastically reduced the abundance of E. solidaginis and natural enemies resulting in slow recoveries to pre-drought numbers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据