4.6 Article

Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification

期刊

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 350-357

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2011.06.008

关键词

Fetal heart rate; Cardiotocography; Nonlinear methods; Feature selection; Classification

资金

  1. Ministry of Health Care [NT11124-6/2010]
  2. CTU in Prague [MSM 6840770012]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of Czech Republic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

* We analyzed fetal heart rate of normal and acidemic fetuses. * We used conventional and nonlinear features for the signal analysis. * Addition of nonlinear features improves accuracy of classification. * The best nonlinear features are: Lempel Ziv complexity and Sample entropy. * Combination of conventional and nonlinear features provides the best accuracy. Abstract: Fetal heart rate (FHR) is used to evaluate fetal well-being and enables clinicians to detect ongoing hypoxia during delivery. Routine clinical evaluation of intrapartum FHR is based on macroscopic morphological features visible to the naked eye. In this paper we evaluated conventional features and compared them to the nonlinear ones in the task of intrapartum FHR classification. The experiments were performed using a database of 217 FUR records with objective annotations, i.e. pH measurement. We have proven that the addition of nonlinear features improves accuracy of classification. The best classification results were achieved using a combination of conventional and nonlinear features with sensitivity of 73.4%, specificity of 76.3%, and F-measure of 71.9%. The best selected nonlinear features were: Lempel Ziv complexity, Sample entropy, and fractal dimension estimated by Higuchi method. Since the results of automatic signal evaluation are easily reproducible, the process of FHR evaluation can become more objective and may enable clinicians to focus on additional non-cardiotocography parameters influencing the fetus during delivery. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据