4.6 Article

Time-frequency analysis of variabilities of heart rate, systolic blood pressure and pulse transit time before and after exercise using the recursive autoregressive model

期刊

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 364-369

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2011.03.009

关键词

Time-variant spectrum; Exercise; Cardiovascular oscillations; Pulse transit time; Cuffless blood pressure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Time-frequency (T-F) analysis is often used to study the non-stationary cardiovascular oscillations such as heart rate and blood pressure variabilities in dynamic situations. This study intends to use the T-F recursive autoregressive technique to investigate variability in pulse transit time (PTT), which is a cardiovascular parameter of emerging interest due to its potential to estimate blood pressure non-invasively, continuously and without a cuff. Recent studies suggest that PTT is not only related to systolic blood pressure (SBP) but also to heart rate. Therefore, in this study, variability of PTT is analyzed together with the variabilities of R-R interval (RRI) from electrocardiogram and beat-to-beat SBP on 9 normotensive subjects before and shortly after three successive bouts of treadmill exercise. The results showed that both low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) components were found in the spectra of RRI, SBP and PTT in the 5-min recordings collected before and after exercise. Compared to the baseline, a decrease in the power of the HF component of RRI followed by an increase in its LF component indicated firstly a vagal withdrawal and then sympathetic activity enhancement after successive bouts of exercise. On the other hand, although changes in the LF and HF components of PTT were more similar to those of SBP than of RRI, the LF/HF ratio of SBP was almost 4 times higher than that of PTT. Based on the results, it is therefore suggested that the relationship between SBP and PTT is frequency-dependent. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据