4.6 Article

Logistic regression and survival analysis of 450 impotent patients treated with injection therapy: Long-term dropout parameters

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 163, 期 2, 页码 467-470

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67902-5

关键词

impotence; patient dropouts; papaverine; alprostadil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We report the dropout rate associated with intracavernosal self-injection for erectile dysfunction at long-term followup, and determine parameters related to dropout. Materials and Methods: Of 2,252 impotent patients evaluated during 9 years 450 (20%) enrolled in our self-injection program. Papaverine and phentolamine were given in 53% (initial treatment), prostaglandin E1 in 21%, and papaverine, phentolamine and prostaglandin E1 (triple mixture) in 26% of cases. Average injection volume for the 3 injection types was 0.52 cc. Data were retrospectively reviewed for patient dropout versus nondropout, specifically for type of drug, volume injected, changing treatment (from 1 drug and/or dosage to another), patient age, marital status, ethnic group, impotence duration and diabetes. Results: Patient age ranged from 23 to 79 years (mean age 55). Of the patients treated at least 4 months 155 (35%) dropped out of the study. Mean treatment duration was 3.5 years. Logistic regression suggested that type of drug, changing treatment during the course of therapy and dosage (volume injected) were the only significant (p <0.05) parameters influencing dropout. Papaverine and phentolamine were twice as likely to lead to dropout as triple mixture or prostaglandin E1, and injection greater than 0.5 cc was more than twice as likely to lead to dropout. Demographic, ethnic, age and etiological factors had no significant effect on the overall dropout rate. Conclusions: The effectiveness of injection therapy was an underlying factor determining the long-term dropout rate for patients with erectile dysfunction. Other parameters or combinations of parameters that may influence patient dropout remain to be explored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据