4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with congestive heart failure: A prospective study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00563-X

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We sought to prospectively determine whether patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) could be identified by clinical and study variables including the P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram (P-SAECG). BACKGROUND Although it is important to assess the risk of developing PAF in patients with CHF, it still remains difficult to predict the PAF appearance in patients with CHF clinically. METHODS The study group consisted of 75 patients in sinus rhythm without a history of PAF, whose left ventricular ejection fraction, as measured by radionuclide angiography, was <40%. These patients underwent P-SAECG, echocardiography and 24-h Holter monitoring; in addition, the plasma concentration of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) was measured at study entry. RESULTS An abnormal P-SAECG was found at study entry in 29 of 75 patients. In the follow-up period of 21 +/- 9 months, the PAF attacks documented on the ECG significantly more frequently occurred in patients with (32%) rather than without an abnormal P-SAECG (2%) (p = 0.0002). The plasma ANP level was significantly higher in patients with rather than without PAF attacks (75 +/- 41 vs. 54 +/- 60 pg/ml, p = 0.01), although there were no significant differences in age, left atrial dimension Or high grade atrial premature beats between the groups. The multivariate Cox analysis identified that the variables significantly associated with PAF development were an abnormal P-SAECG (hazard ratio 19.1, p = 0.0069) and elevated ANP level greater than or equal to 60 pg/ml (hazard ratio 8.6, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS An abnormal P-SAECC and elevated ANP level could be predictors of PAF development in patients with CHF. (J Am Coil Cardiol 2000;35:405-13) (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据