4.7 Article

Distinct stages of cytochrome c release from mitochondria: evidence for a feedback amplification loop linking caspase activation to mitochondrial dysfunction in genotoxic stress induced apoptosis

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 227-233

出版社

STOCKTON PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400629

关键词

apoptosis; mitochondria; cytochrome c; caspases; ionizing radiation; Bcl-2

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA81504, R01 CA081504] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytochrome c (cyto c) release from mitochondria is a critical event in apoptosis, By investigating the ordering of molecular events during genotoxic stress-induced apoptosis, we found that ionizing radiation (IR) and etoposide induced the release of cyto c from mitochondria in two distinct stages. The early release of low levels of cyto c into the cytosol preceded the activation of caspase 9 and 3, but had no eff ect on ATP levels or mitochrondrial transmembrane potential (Delta psi(m)). In contrast, the late stage cyto c release resulted in a drastic loss of mitochondrial cyto c and was associated with reduction of ATP levels and Delta psi(m). Moreover, caspases contributed to the late cyto c release since the caspase inhibitor zVAD prevented only the late but not the early-stage cyto c release. Recombinant caspase 3 induced cyto c release from isolated mitochondria in the absence of cytosolic factors. Bcl-2 but not Bid was cleaved during apoptosis after caspase activation. This suggests that Bcl-2 cleavage might contribute to the late cyto c release, which results in mitochondrial dysfunction manifested by the decrease of ATP and Delta psi(m). zVAD prevented the reduction of ATP, Delta psi(m), and nuclear condensation when added up to 8 h after IR, at the time the caspases were highly activated but when the majority of cyto c was still maintained in the mitochondria. These findings link the feedback loop control of caspase-induced cyto c release with mitochondrial dysfunction manifested by ATP and Delta psi(m) decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据