4.7 Article

Mild forms of Guillain-Barre syndrome in an epidemiologic survey in the Netherlands

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 620-625

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.54.3.620

关键词

Guillain-Barre syndrome; epidemiology; subgroups

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Assessment of incidence rates of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) in the Netherlands over a 10-year period; investigation of a relationship between possible seasonality in GBS and the occurrence of preceding infections; and determination of distinctive characteristics in patients with GBS who are only mildly affected table to walk unaided at nadir). Method: Records of patients with GBS admitted between 1987 and 1996 from all 45 hospitals in the southwest Netherlands were evaluated, covering a population of 4.2 million inhabitants. Results: A total of 476 patients met National Institute for Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke criteria for GBS. This resulted in a crude incidence rate (IR) of 1.18/100,000 inhabitants. This IR increased linearly with age (p < 0.001). Men were more frequently affected than women (p ( 0.001). No seasonal preponderance for GBS, nor for any of the preceding infections, was found. Patients under 50 years of age (p < 0.001) and men (p = 0.01) were more frequently found in the mildly affected group. In both groups a preceding infection was reported in 70% of the cases. In the severely affected group, serologic evidence for infection with Campylobacter jejuni, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, or Mycoplasma pneumoniae was found more frequently than in the mildly affected group (41% versus 16%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Overall IR in the Netherlands are similar to those found in other studies. The incidence increases linearly with age and men are more frequently affected than women. Distinctive characteristics for mildly and severely affected patients were found regarding age, sex, and preceding infections. This suggests that other infectious agents or host factors may be involved in mild forms of GBS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据