4.7 Article

Temporal evolution of ischemic injury evaluated with diffusion-, perfusion-, and T2-weighted MRI

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 689-696

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.54.3.689

关键词

cerebral ischemia; transient; MRI; middle cerebral artery occlusion; rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Ischemic lesions seen on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) are reversible if reperfusion is performed within minutes after the onset of ischemia. This study was designed to determine whether acute reversibility of DWI abnormalities is transient following brief temporary focal brain ischemia and to characterize the temporal evolution of in vivo ischemic lesions. Met hods: Eight rats were subjected to 30 minutes of temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion and underwent diffusion-, perfusion-, and T2-weighted MRI during occlusion; immediately after reperfusion; 30, 60, and 90 minutes after reperfusion; and 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after reperfusion. Average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC(av)) values and the cerebral blood flow index (CBFi) ratio were calculated in both the lateral caudoputamen and overlying cortex at each time point. The size of the in vivo ischemic abnormalities was calculated from the ADC(av) and the T2 maps. Postmortem triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining was used to verify ischemic injury. Results: Both the CBFi ratio and ADC(av) values declined significantly in the two regions during occlusion. The CBFi ratio recovered immediately after reperfusion and remained unchanged over 72 hours. However, ADC(av) values returned to normal at 60 to 90 minutes and secondarily decreased at 12 hours after reperfusion as compared with those in the contralateral hemisphere. The extent of the in vivo ischemic lesions maximized at 48 hours and was highly correlated with TTC-derived lesion size. Conclusions: Acute recovery of initial ADC(av)-defined lesions after reperfusion is transient, and secondary ADC(av)-defined lesions develop in a slow and delayed fashion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据