4.6 Article

A prominent role for Sp1 during lipopolysaccharide-mediated induction of the IL-10 promoter in macrophages

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 164, 期 4, 页码 1940-1951

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.1940

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI34032, AI22553] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IL-10 is an antiinflammatory cytokine secreted by activated macrophages and Th2 cells. IL-10 secretion promotes the downregulation of proinflammatory cytokine synthesis and the development of Th2 responses. In macrophages, proinflammatory cytokines appear to be induced by similar mechanisms, but the IL-10 induction mechanisms have not been examined. We have analyzed the murine IL-10 promoter in the RAW264,7 macrophage line activated with LPS, A comprehensive mutant analysis revealed only one element upstream of the core promoter that was essential for promoter induction. A refined mutant analysis localized this element to nucleotides -89 to -78, and gel shift experiments revealed that it represents a nonconsensus binding site for Sp1. The functional relevance of Sp1 was supported by the high affinity of the interaction, the close correlation between the nucleotides required for Sp1 binding and promoter function, and the ability of an Sp1 consensus sequence to substitute for the -89/-78 promoter sequence. Evidence that Spl may be a target of signaling pathways involved in IL-10 induction was provided by the exclusive requirement for the Sp1 binding site, by the ability of the Spl site to confer induction to a heterologous promoter, and by the delineation of an Sp1 domain that can mediate induction. No relevant contribution from ReI, C/EBP (CCAAT/ enhancer-binding protein), or AP-1 binding sites, which regulate most proinflammatory cytokine promoters, was observed. Together, these results demonstrate that IL-10 gene regulation is distinct from the regulation of proinflammatory cytokine genes, and suggest that Sp1 may be a central mediator of IL-10 induction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据